HTEC vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTEC returned -5.35%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for THNQ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

HTEC vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 37.86% return.

HTEC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: -0.62%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: 27.39%
• 3Y*: 5.44%
• 5Y*: -5.35%
• 10Y*: —

THNQ

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: 11.10%
• YTD: 37.86%
• 6M: 39.11%
• 1Y: 67.65%
• 3Y*: 33.66%
• 5Y*: 15.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTEC vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	-0.62%	23.91%	2.68%	-2.94%	-33.72%	-0.28%	53.75%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	37.86%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-39.84%	9.10%	60.92%

Correlation

The correlation between HTEC and THNQ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between HTEC and THNQ has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HTEC vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTEC	THNQ
Healthcare	77.3%	5.2%
Financial Services	3.9%	1.4%
Technology	3.7%	74.2%
Industrials	1.3%	0.8%
Energy	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HTEC vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTEC

HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 35
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 29

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTEC vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTEC	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.41	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.94	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	3.70	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.08	11.78	-7.70

HTEC vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTEC and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTEC vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTEC	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.53%	-50.56%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-18.39%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-29.88%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.10%	-50.56%	-5.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.64%	-6.41%	-25.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.99%	-15.02%	-13.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.73%	5.76%	+0.97%

Volatility

HTEC vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is 6.90%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that HTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTEC	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.90%	12.98%	-6.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.66%	22.95%	-7.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.88%	28.22%	-7.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	29.42%	-4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.48%	28.87%	-3.39%

HTEC vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HTEC and THNQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

HTEC vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	0.99%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTEC and THNQ in my portfolio?

HTEC and THNQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTEC or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to HTEC (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, HTEC or THNQ?

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 15.77% vs -5.35% for HTEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HTEC or THNQ?

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 15.77% return vs -5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTEC or THNQ?

HTEC and THNQ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTEC or THNQ?

HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between HTEC and THNQ?

HTEC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while THNQ is Technology Equities. HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.