HSCZ vs. ESPO
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSCZ returned 10.94%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.99% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -10.58% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and ESPO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HSCZ and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
ESPO
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Industrials
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Financial Services
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Technology
HSCZ
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
ESPO
Basic Materials
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Real Estate
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Healthcare
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Energy
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Communication Services
HSCZ
ESPO
Utilities
HSCZ
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
ESPO
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.88 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | -0.54 | +3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | -0.94 | +13.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -50.99% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -27.81% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -27.81% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -48.33% | +28.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -27.19% | +26.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -15.06% | +10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 15.95% | -13.70% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 4.08%, while VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 4.42% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 14.67% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 18.83% | -7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 25.10% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 25.71% | -10.03% |
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than ESPO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.93% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and ESPO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, HSCZ leads with 10.94% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.55% for ESPO.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer