PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -18.43% return.


HOOX

1D
-12.45%
1M
10.42%
YTD
-60.76%
6M
-72.98%
1Y
-31.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOQB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-24.99%
1Y
-27.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and OOQB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.60

The correlation between HOOX and OOQB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOXOOQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.94

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.51

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-0.91

+0.31

HOOX vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOXOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.53

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.41

+0.75

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and OOQB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-53.44%

-33.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

-53.44%

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.84%

-43.69%

-38.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.46%

-23.26%

-14.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.44%

30.11%

+23.33%

Volatility

HOOX vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.73%

0.00%

+41.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.05%

39.39%

+61.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.62%

51.57%

+86.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.08%

58.12%

+85.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.08%

58.12%

+85.96%

HOOX vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, more than OOQB's 11.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOX and OOQB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

On 1-year performance, OOQB leads with -27.35% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OOQB has performed better with a -27.35% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 11.62% for OOQB.

HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.75% for OOQB.

HOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and OOQB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer