PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. BE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -57.88% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 151.26% return.


HOOX

1D
8.78%
1M
-38.71%
6M
-30.51%
YTD
-57.88%
1Y
-59.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
57.40%

BE

1D
6.08%
1M
-19.41%
6M
39.83%
YTD
151.26%
1Y
494.55%
3Y*
139.56%
5Y*
60.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.13B$3.65B$3.54B
$1.62M$2.22M$2.93M

HOOX vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
-57.88%342.84%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
151.26%264.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and BE is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOX vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOXBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

9.47

-10.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

27.13

-28.09

HOOX vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and BE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-92.54%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

-52.65%

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.50%

-36.87%

-43.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.78%

-51.48%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.30%

18.35%

+42.95%

Volatility

HOOX vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) is 35.94%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 42.79%. This indicates that HOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.94%

42.79%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.27%

84.87%

+23.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.97%

114.80%

+26.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.26%

88.80%

+54.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.26%

96.71%

+46.55%

Dividends

HOOX vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.53%, while BE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
33.53%14.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOX and BE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (42.79%) compared to HOOX (35.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs BE's -92.54%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and BE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer