PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. HOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than HOOW's -34.08% return.


HOOX

1D
-12.45%
1M
10.42%
YTD
-60.76%
6M
-72.98%
1Y
-31.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOW

1D
-7.51%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-34.08%
6M
-46.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
-60.76%48.86%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-34.08%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and HOOW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

1.00

HOOX vs. HOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOOX
HOOW

Financial Services

100.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HOOX
100.0%
HOOW
3.3%

Basic Materials

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Communication Services

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Consumer Cyclical

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Consumer Defensive

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Energy

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Healthcare

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Industrials

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Real Estate

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Technology

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Utilities

HOOX

-

HOOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOXHOOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

HOOX vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOXHOOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.04

+0.38

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than HOOW's maximum drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and HOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXHOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-65.74%

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.84%

-55.23%

-26.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.46%

-29.13%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.44%

Volatility

HOOX vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXHOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.62%

83.86%

+53.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.08%

83.86%

+60.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.08%

83.86%

+60.22%

HOOX vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, less than HOOW's 163.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
163.90%67.92%
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
35.99%14.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, HOOX and HOOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 163.90%, compared with 35.99% for HOOX.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.99% for HOOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and HOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer