PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HOOX having a -60.76% return and HOOG slightly higher at -60.40%.


HOOX

1D
-12.45%
1M
10.42%
YTD
-60.76%
6M
-72.98%
1Y
-31.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-12.13%
1M
10.59%
YTD
-60.40%
6M
-72.73%
1Y
-29.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and HOOG is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

1.00

The correlation between HOOX and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOXHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.07

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.34

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-0.55

-0.04

HOOX vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOXHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.22

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.31

+0.04

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-86.94%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

-86.94%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.84%

-81.53%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.46%

-37.56%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.44%

53.22%

+0.22%

Volatility

HOOX vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) have volatilities of 41.73% and 41.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.73%

41.51%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.05%

100.64%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.62%

137.15%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.08%

144.88%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.08%

144.88%

-0.80%

HOOX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, more than HOOG's 31.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, HOOX and HOOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to HOOG (41.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -29.31% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HOOG has been the lower-risk option at 41.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -29.31% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 31.07% for HOOG.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.75% for HOOG.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer