PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. XOMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. XOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -55.19% return, which is significantly lower than XOMX's 46.54% return.


HOOG

1D
-1.14%
1M
-40.41%
6M
-6.67%
YTD
-55.19%
1Y
-60.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
58.47%

XOMX

1D
-3.24%
1M
21.85%
6M
-0.92%
YTD
46.54%
1Y
81.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
52.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.55M$12.03M$16.56M
$1.33M$1.20M$1.10M

HOOG vs. XOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-55.19%387.84%
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
46.54%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and XOMX is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. XOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOG vs. XOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOGXOMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.27

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.07

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

4.93

-5.91

HOOG vs. XOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the XOMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and XOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. XOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than XOMX's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and XOMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGXOMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-39.64%

-47.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-39.64%

-47.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.10%

-26.16%

-52.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-10.91%

-31.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.44%

16.60%

+44.84%

Volatility

HOOG vs. XOMX - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 35.24% compared to Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) at 14.02%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGXOMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.24%

14.02%

+21.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.06%

41.39%

+64.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.95%

49.99%

+89.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.69%

48.40%

+95.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.69%

48.40%

+95.29%

HOOG vs. XOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOG vs. XOMX - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.46%, more than XOMX's 1.79% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOG and XOMX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (35.24%) compared to XOMX (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs XOMX's -39.64%.

On 1-year performance, XOMX leads with 81.54% vs -60.07% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XOMX has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMX has performed better with a 81.54% return vs -60.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XOMX.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.46%, compared with 1.79% for XOMX.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 1.07% for XOMX.

XOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and XOMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer