PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMX vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMX achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 450.51% return.


XOMX

1D
1.24%
1M
14.89%
6M
22.78%
YTD
41.72%
1Y
72.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
3.95%
1M
-47.52%
6M
252.58%
YTD
450.51%
1Y
2,623.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
41.72%17.15%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
450.51%1,116.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMX and MULL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.07

XOMX vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOMX
MULL

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

66.7%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOMX
100.0%
MULL

-

Basic Materials

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Communication Services

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Consumer Defensive

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Financial Services

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Healthcare

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Industrials

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Real Estate

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Technology

XOMX

-

MULL
66.7%

Utilities

XOMX

-

MULL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMXMULLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.63

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

47.71

-45.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

147.08

-142.55

XOMX vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 17.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMX and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMX and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMXMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-72.29%

+32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.64%

-55.74%

+16.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.59%

-53.99%

+25.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-21.20%

+10.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.02%

18.06%

-2.04%

Volatility

XOMX vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) is 14.81%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 63.15%. This indicates that XOMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMXMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

63.15%

-48.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.93%

126.45%

-84.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.78%

153.59%

-103.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.59%

145.06%

-96.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

145.06%

-96.47%

XOMX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

XOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than MULL's 0.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOMX and MULL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MULL has higher volatility (63.15%) compared to XOMX (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMX dropped -39.64% vs MULL's -72.29%.

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 2623.22% vs 72.36% for XOMX. On fees, XOMX is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, XOMX has been the lower-risk option at 14.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 2623.22% return vs 72.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOMX is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

XOMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.07% for MULL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XOMX and 1.50% for MULL.

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.35 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMX and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer