PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMX vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMX vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMX achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 56.28% return.


XOMX

1D
1.24%
1M
14.89%
6M
22.78%
YTD
41.72%
1Y
72.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LABU

1D
-6.20%
1M
20.42%
6M
50.21%
YTD
56.28%
1Y
299.44%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
-27.81%
10Y*
-10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMX vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMX and LABU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.18

XOMX vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOMX
LABU

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

99.5%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOMX
100.0%
LABU

-

Basic Materials

XOMX

-

LABU
0.0%

Communication Services

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Consumer Defensive

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Financial Services

XOMX

-

LABU
0.5%

Healthcare

XOMX

-

LABU
99.5%

Industrials

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Real Estate

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Technology

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Utilities

XOMX

-

LABU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMX vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMX vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMXLABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

9.83

-7.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

26.93

-22.40

XOMX vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMX and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMX vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMX and LABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMXLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-99.18%

+59.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.64%

-30.70%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.59%

-94.49%

+65.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-81.79%

+71.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.02%

11.18%

+4.84%

Volatility

XOMX vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) is 14.81%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 25.41%. This indicates that XOMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMXLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

25.41%

-10.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.93%

63.66%

-21.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.78%

79.41%

-29.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.59%

96.07%

-47.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

95.22%

-46.63%

XOMX vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMX vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

XOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than LABU's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.41%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
1.86%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMX and LABU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (25.41%) compared to XOMX (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMX dropped -39.64% vs LABU's -99.18%.

On 1-year performance, LABU leads with 299.44% vs 72.36% for XOMX. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, XOMX has been the lower-risk option at 14.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LABU has performed better with a 299.44% return vs 72.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LABU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XOMX.

XOMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.41% for LABU.

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XOMX and 0.96% for LABU.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMX and LABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer