HOOG vs. UGA
HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. HOOG is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -21.60% vs 79.48% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
HOOG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -55.34% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
HOOG
- 1D
- 12.78%
- 1M
- 23.20%
- YTD
- -55.34%
- 6M
- -70.69%
- 1Y
- -21.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
HOOG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -55.34% | 291.44% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOG and UGA is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
HOOG
UGA
HOOG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 5.37 | -5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 12.86 | -13.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 2.27 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.12 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
HOOG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -86.59% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.94% | -14.88% | -72.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.17% | -14.75% | -64.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.70% | -36.76% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.46% | 6.20% | +47.26% |
Volatility
HOOG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 43.09% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 11.64%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.09% | 11.64% | +31.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.33% | 30.48% | +70.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.25% | 35.27% | +101.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.07% | 34.40% | +110.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.07% | 37.27% | +107.80% |
HOOG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HOOG and UGA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
HOOG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 27.55% | 12.30% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOG and UGA have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (43.09%) compared to UGA (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs -21.60% for HOOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 11.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs -21.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOG and UGA have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
HOOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Concierge Technologies.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOG and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer