PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -55.34% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-55.34%291.44%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and UGA is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOGUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

5.37

-5.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

12.86

-13.27

HOOG vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOGUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

2.27

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.12

+0.29

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-86.59%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-14.88%

-72.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.17%

-14.75%

-64.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.70%

-36.76%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

6.20%

+47.26%

Volatility

HOOG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 43.09% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 11.64%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

11.64%

+31.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

30.48%

+70.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.25%

35.27%

+101.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.07%

34.40%

+110.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.07%

37.27%

+107.80%

HOOG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOG and UGA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

HOOG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOG and UGA have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (43.09%) compared to UGA (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs -21.60% for HOOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 11.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs -21.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG and UGA have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

HOOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Concierge Technologies.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer