HOOG vs. SPUU
HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -21.60% vs 54.50% for SPUU. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
HOOG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -55.34% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 20.66% return.
HOOG
- 1D
- 12.78%
- 1M
- 23.20%
- YTD
- -55.34%
- 6M
- -70.69%
- 1Y
- -21.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- 24.74%
HOOG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -55.34% | 291.44% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 20.66% | 38.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOG and SPUU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HOOG and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
HOOG
SPUU
HOOG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 3.01 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 13.28 | -13.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 2.29 | -2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HOOG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -59.35% | -27.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.94% | -18.19% | -68.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.17% | -0.58% | -78.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.70% | -9.50% | -28.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.46% | 4.12% | +49.34% |
Volatility
HOOG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 43.09% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.60%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.09% | 5.60% | +37.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.33% | 18.10% | +83.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.25% | 23.88% | +113.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.07% | 33.46% | +111.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.07% | 35.76% | +109.31% |
HOOG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%, more than SPUU's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 27.55% | 12.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (43.09%) compared to SPUU (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 54.50% vs -21.60% for HOOG. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 54.50% return vs -21.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HOOG.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 1.33% for SPUU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 0.64% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer