HODL vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HODL returned -43.00% vs 99.05% for SMH. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HODL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

HODL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HODL achieves a -25.88% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return.

HODL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -11.66%
• YTD: -25.88%
• 1Y: -43.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.70%

SMH

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -5.73%
• 6M: 49.13%
• YTD: 58.19%
• 1Y: 99.05%
• 3Y*: 55.27%
• 5Y*: 34.32%
• 10Y*: 34.58%
• ALL TIME*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	$21.67M	$18.55M	$23.31M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.47B	$7.04B	$7.03B

HODL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	-25.88%	-6.42%	91.50%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	58.19%	49.17%	40.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HODL and SMH is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

HODL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HODL

HODL Risk / Return Rank: 2
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HODL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HODL	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	2.57	-3.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.41	2.93	-4.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.39	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	4.05	-4.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	15.89	-17.12

HODL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HODL Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HODL and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HODL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HODL drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODL and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HODL	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.20%	-84.96%	+31.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.20%	-24.62%	-28.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.35%	-14.83%	-33.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.32%	-40.88%	+22.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.97%	6.26%	+28.71%

Volatility

HODL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) is 8.27%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that HODL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HODL	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.27%	14.68%	-6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.98%	33.23%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.24%	38.76%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.17%	36.59%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.17%	33.37%	+15.80%

HODL vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HODL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HODL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.19%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HODL and SMH in my portfolio?

HODL and SMH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HODL or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to HODL (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HODL dropped -53.20% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, HODL or SMH?

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 99.05% vs -43.00% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HODL or SMH?

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 99.05% return vs -43.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HODL or SMH?

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HODL or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

What is the main difference between HODL and SMH?

HODL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SMH is Semiconductors. HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HODL and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.