PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HODL vs. DURA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HODL vs. DURA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HODL achieves a -28.02% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 11.35% return.


HODL

1D
-1.93%
1M
-18.91%
YTD
-28.02%
6M
-28.46%
1Y
-39.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DURA

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.00%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HODL vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-28.02%-6.42%91.50%
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
11.35%7.61%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HODL and DURA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HODL vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DURA
DURA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HODL vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HODLDURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.30

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.36

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

9.63

-10.94

HODL vs. DURA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HODL Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the DURA Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HODL and DURA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HODL vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HODL drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than DURA's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODL and DURA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HODLDURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-33.15%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.96%

-8.53%

-43.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.85%

-3.53%

-46.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-3.91%

-12.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.16%

2.08%

+28.08%

Volatility

HODL vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) at 3.18%. This indicates that HODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HODLDURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

3.18%

+9.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.42%

7.80%

+26.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.94%

14.78%

+29.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.91%

13.62%

+36.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.91%

16.96%

+32.95%

HODL vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HODL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HODL vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison

HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
3.34%3.59%3.33%3.58%3.01%2.89%3.49%3.83%0.66%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HODL and DURA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to DURA (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HODL dropped -51.96% vs DURA's -33.15%.

On 1-year performance, DURA leads with 19.88% vs -39.15% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DURA has performed better with a 19.88% return vs -39.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

HODL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HODL and 0.29% for DURA.

DURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HODL and DURA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer