DURA vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
DURA is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. FXAIX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 1988. Both DURA and FXAIX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DURA vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DURA vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 10.74% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 0.82% | 2.41% | 15.53% | 0.04% | 27.55% | -3.80% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 26.29% | -18.14% | 28.71% | 18.42% | 31.48% | -7.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's -7.05% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FXAIX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURA vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
FXAIX
DURA vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURA | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 5.13 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURA | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.75 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and FXAIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DURA vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than FXAIX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.25% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and FXAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -33.79% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -12.13% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | -24.50% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -8.89% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -3.83% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.50% | +1.10% |
Volatility
DURA vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 2.76%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 4.24% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 9.08% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 18.13% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 16.88% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 18.03% | -0.94% |