DURA vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
DURA and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DURA is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both DURA and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DURA or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and SMH is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DURA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DURA:
1.05
SMH:
1.25
DURA:
1.54
SMH:
1.76
DURA:
1.19
SMH:
1.22
DURA:
1.37
SMH:
1.75
DURA:
5.28
SMH:
4.38
DURA:
1.91%
SMH:
9.95%
DURA:
9.61%
SMH:
34.83%
DURA:
-33.12%
SMH:
-95.73%
DURA:
-6.41%
SMH:
-13.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 38.79% return.
DURA
8.17%
-4.42%
4.75%
9.52%
5.24%
N/A
SMH
38.79%
-1.38%
-8.37%
40.07%
29.31%
27.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURA vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DURA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DURA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while SMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.06% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.08% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DURA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 3.39%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.