PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HODL vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HODL vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HODL achieves a -25.27% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's -8.99% return.


HODL

1D
-2.79%
1M
-18.34%
YTD
-25.27%
6M
-29.73%
1Y
-38.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HODL vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-25.27%-6.42%99.75%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HODL and BIZD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HODL vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HODL vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HODLBIZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.89

-0.72

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.23

-0.93

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.90

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.58

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.03

-0.34

HODL vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HODL Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HODL and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HODLBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.72

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.30

0.00

Drawdowns

HODL vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HODL drawdown since its inception was -49.25%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODL and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HODLBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.25%

-55.44%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.25%

-22.22%

-27.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.93%

-19.27%

-28.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-6.72%

-9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.35%

12.63%

+15.72%

Volatility

HODL vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.79%. This indicates that HODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HODLBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

4.79%

+4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.37%

14.77%

+19.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.51%

18.11%

+25.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.88%

17.40%

+32.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.88%

21.74%

+28.14%

HODL vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HODL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

HODL vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HODL and BIZD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HODL dropped -49.25% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 1-year performance, BIZD leads with -12.94% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIZD has performed better with a -12.94% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BIZD.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

HODL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BIZD is Financials Equities. HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HODL and 0.42% for BIZD.

BIZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HODL and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer