HLT vs. LNG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 48.67%/yr vs 21.91%/yr for LNG. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HLT vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 48.67%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 21.91% annualized return.

HLT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 7.58%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 26.36%
• 1Y: 35.01%
• 3Y*: 34.37%
• 5Y*: 22.25%
• 10Y*: 48.67%

LNG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 18.42%
• 1Y: -1.71%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 22.98%
• 10Y*: 21.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLT vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.	18.69%	16.49%	36.11%	44.68%	-18.72%	40.20%	0.47%	55.48%	-9.40%	829.98%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	22.32%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HLT and LNG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013	0.29

The correlation between HLT and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap HLT : $79.03B LNG : $49.81B
EPS HLT : $6.50 LNG : $6.80
PE Ratio HLT : 52.41 LNG : 34.79
PEG Ratio HLT : 0.85 LNG : 0.19
PS Ratio HLT : 6.58 LNG : 2.53
Total Revenue (TTM) HLT : $12.28B LNG : $20.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) HLT : $5.44B LNG : $5.52B
EBITDA (TTM) HLT : $3.00B LNG : $5.81B

Return for Risk

HLT vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLT

HLT Risk / Return Rank: 82
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 37
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLT vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLT	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-0.06	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	0.11	+2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.01	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	-0.07	+3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	-0.15	+8.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLT vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLT and LNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLT	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	-0.06	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.76	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.68	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.16	+0.07

Drawdowns

HLT vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLT	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	-97.84%	+47.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-24.09%	+13.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.35%	-24.87%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.65%	-24.87%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.82%	-57.53%	+6.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-20.12%	+19.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.73%	-43.16%	+33.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	11.67%	-7.24%

Volatility

HLT vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is 6.93%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that HLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLT	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	7.91%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.33%	21.87%	-4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.12%	27.75%	-4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.07%	30.28%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	181.03%	32.59%	+148.44%

Dividends

HLT vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than LNG's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.33%	0.36%	0.00%	0.13%	0.54%	0.84%	31.40%	1.03%	0.65%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.92%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

HLT vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLT and LNG in my portfolio?

HLT and LNG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLT or LNG?

LNG has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs LNG's -97.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.