HLAL vs. VUG
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLAL returned 15.86%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
HLAL vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
HLAL vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and VUG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HLAL and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
HLAL vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HLAL
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
Technology
HLAL
VUG
Communication Services
HLAL
VUG
Healthcare
HLAL
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
HLAL
VUG
Industrials
HLAL
VUG
Energy
HLAL
VUG
Consumer Defensive
HLAL
VUG
Basic Materials
HLAL
VUG
Utilities
HLAL
VUG
Real Estate
HLAL
VUG
Financial Services
HLAL
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
VUG
HLAL vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLAL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.31 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 1.69 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.85 | 5.92 | +13.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLAL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | 1.77 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.62 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -50.68% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -16.53% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -22.85% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -35.61% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.51% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -7.09% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 4.71% | -2.51% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.83% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 12.11% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 15.84% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 22.22% | -4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 21.44% | -1.23% |
HLAL vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLAL vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLAL and VUG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to HLAL (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 15.11% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 15.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.03% for VUG.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLAL and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer