PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPS vs. FBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIPS vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIPS vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
1.17%1.00%13.71%16.09%-3.45%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
-27.59%0.50%112.72%341.59%-1.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -27.59% return.


HIPS

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
1.17%
6M
2.76%
1Y
0.21%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
6.08%

FBL

1D
2.53%
1M
-23.32%
YTD
-27.59%
6M
-42.06%
1Y
-23.67%
3Y*
44.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIPS vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIPS vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPS
HIPS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPS vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIPSFBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

-0.30

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

0.08

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.35

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.20

-0.77

+0.97

HIPS vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the FBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIPS and FBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIPSFBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

-0.30

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.12

-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between HIPS and FBL is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HIPS vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than FBL's 2.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
11.22%11.04%10.04%10.32%10.76%8.43%9.50%6.93%8.66%7.28%7.20%8.17%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
2.86%2.07%0.00%51.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIPS vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and FBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPSFBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.14%

-61.15%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-61.03%

+48.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-53.07%

+49.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-14.87%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

27.41%

-23.87%

Volatility

HIPS vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is 3.83%, while GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a volatility of 27.60%. This indicates that HIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIPSFBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

27.60%

-23.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

54.08%

-46.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

79.50%

-64.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

70.82%

-57.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

70.82%

-52.69%