PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPS vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIPS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HIPS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.64%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


HIPS

1D
-0.09%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
4.11%
6M
3.85%
1Y
8.09%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
5.64%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIPS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
4.11%1.00%13.71%16.09%-13.47%22.65%-11.74%22.94%-9.30%6.30%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HIPS and SCHD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2015

0.59

The correlation between HIPS and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HIPS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIPS
SCHD

Energy

32.7%
16.2%

Real Estate

31.7%

-

Financial Services

31.6%
9.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Industrials

-

7.5%

Technology

-

16.4%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Energy

HIPS
32.7%
SCHD
16.2%

Real Estate

HIPS
31.7%
SCHD

-

Financial Services

HIPS
31.6%
SCHD
9.3%

Basic Materials

HIPS
4.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

HIPS
0.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HIPS

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

HIPS

-

SCHD
19.2%

Healthcare

HIPS

-

SCHD
18.8%

Industrials

HIPS

-

SCHD
7.5%

Technology

HIPS

-

SCHD
16.4%

Utilities

HIPS

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIPS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPS
HIPS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIPSSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

2.57

-1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

3.98

-2.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

6.17

-4.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.32

15.20

-11.88

HIPS vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIPS and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIPSSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.57

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.59

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.77

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.86

-0.63

Drawdowns

HIPS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPSSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.14%

-33.37%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-4.61%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-16.13%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

-16.85%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

-33.37%

-19.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-1.40%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-3.32%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.87%

+0.40%

Volatility

HIPS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is 1.76%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that HIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIPSSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

2.92%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

7.66%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

10.96%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

14.38%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.72%

+1.36%

HIPS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIPS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
11.10%11.04%10.04%10.32%10.76%8.43%9.50%6.93%8.66%7.28%7.20%8.17%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIPS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to HIPS (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPS dropped -53.14% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 5.64% for HIPS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, HIPS has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.

HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.10%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.

HIPS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SCHD is Dividend. HIPS tracks TFMS HIPS Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIPS and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer