HIPS vs. YYY
HIPS (GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF) and YYY (Amplify CEF High Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - HIPS tracks the TFMS HIPS Index while YYY tracks the Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HIPS returned 5.41%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for YYY. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIPS charges 3.19%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for YYY.
Performance
HIPS vs. YYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than YYY's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HIPS has underperformed YYY with an annualized return of 5.41%, while YYY has yielded a comparatively higher 5.72% annualized return.
HIPS
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 5.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
YYY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 11.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
HIPS vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 2.67% | 1.00% | 13.71% | 16.09% | -13.47% | 22.65% | -11.74% | 22.94% | -9.30% | 6.30% |
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 4.69% | 13.08% | 11.86% | 12.98% | -21.78% | 14.13% | -0.86% | 21.87% | -10.21% | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIPS and YYY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between HIPS and YYY shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIPS vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank
HIPS
YYY
HIPS vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIPS | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.47 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 6.33 | -3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIPS vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than YYY's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and YYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIPS | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.14% | -42.52% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -8.07% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -13.47% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | -27.92% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | -42.52% | -10.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | -1.08% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -6.82% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.87% | +0.64% |
Volatility
HIPS vs. YYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) at 2.53%. This indicates that HIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIPS | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.53% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 7.22% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 8.70% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 11.37% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 13.89% | +4.15% |
HIPS vs. YYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is lower than YYY's 3.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIPS vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison
HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, less than YYY's 12.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 11.26% | 11.04% | 10.04% | 10.32% | 10.76% | 8.43% | 9.50% | 6.93% | 8.66% | 7.28% | 7.20% | 8.17% |
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 12.59% | 12.51% | 12.50% | 12.39% | 12.36% | 9.08% | 9.79% | 9.10% | 9.73% | 8.16% | 10.34% | 10.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIPS and YYY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIPS has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to YYY (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPS dropped -53.14% vs YYY's -42.52%.
On 10-year performance, YYY leads with 5.72% vs 5.41% for HIPS. On fees, HIPS is cheaper at 3.19% per year. On volatility, YYY has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YYY has performed better with a 5.72% return vs 5.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIPS is cheaper with a 3.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.
YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.59%, compared with 11.26% for HIPS.
HIPS tracks TFMS HIPS Index, while YYY tracks Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 3.23% for YYY.
YYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIPS and YYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer