HGRO vs. PAVE

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HGRO (Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hedgeye Asset Management, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. HGRO is actively managed, while PAVE is passively managed. Over the past year, HGRO returned 18.46% vs 27.21% for PAVE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HGRO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.

Performance

HGRO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGRO achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 18.87% return.

HGRO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 6.22%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAVE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 11.96%
• YTD: 18.87%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 18.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGRO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF	9.38%	13.45%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	18.87%	13.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and PAVE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.68

The correlation between HGRO and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HGRO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGRO

HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 50
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 52
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGRO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HGRO	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.36	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.99	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.29	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	7.97	-0.35

HGRO vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGRO and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGRO	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-44.08%	+36.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-11.91%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-5.30%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-6.20%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	3.42%	-0.99%

Volatility

HGRO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) is 4.07%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that HGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HGRO	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	6.36%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	16.25%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.77%	20.07%	-6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.58%	21.70%	-8.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	24.38%	-10.80%

HGRO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

HGRO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PAVE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HGRO and PAVE in my portfolio?

HGRO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HGRO or PAVE?

PAVE has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to HGRO (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGRO dropped -7.61% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

Which ETF is better, HGRO or PAVE?

On 1-year performance, PAVE leads with 27.21% vs 18.46% for HGRO. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, HGRO has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HGRO or PAVE?

Over the 1-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 27.21% return vs 18.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HGRO or PAVE?

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HGRO or PAVE?

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.07% for HGRO.

What is the main difference between HGRO and PAVE?

HGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye Asset Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.47% for PAVE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.