PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGRO vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGRO vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HGRO having a 8.83% return and BBUS slightly lower at 8.63%.


HGRO

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.05%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
8.63%
6M
8.94%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGRO vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
8.83%13.45%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.63%13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and BBUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.90

The correlation between HGRO and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGRO vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGRO
HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGRO vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGROBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.58

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

11.53

-1.49

HGRO vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGRO and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGROBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-35.35%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-9.21%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-2.51%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-5.44%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.06%

+0.25%

Volatility

HGRO vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 4.42%. This indicates that HGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGROBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.42%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

9.66%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

12.35%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

17.10%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

19.59%

-6.05%

HGRO vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGRO vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HGRO and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HGRO has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to BBUS (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGRO dropped -7.61% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 25.07% vs 24.70% for HGRO. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 25.07% return vs 24.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HGRO.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.07% for HGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye Asset Management and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGRO and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer