HGRO vs. GARY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HGRO (Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGRO is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while GARY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Mango. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HGRO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

HGRO vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGRO achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 28.36% return.

HGRO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: 3.85%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 1Y: 17.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.93%

GARY

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 17.11%
• YTD: 28.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GARY Mango Growth ETF	$604.89K	$386.84K	$304.13K
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF	$1.36M	$1.39M	$1.92M

HGRO vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF	7.49%	0.13%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	28.36%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and GARY is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

HGRO vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HGRO

HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 48
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HGRO vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HGRO	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	—	—

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGRO	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-12.67%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-6.45%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-2.42%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HGRO	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	22.41%	-8.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	22.41%	-8.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	22.41%	-8.72%

HGRO vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

HGRO vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF	0.07%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HGRO and GARY in my portfolio?

HGRO and GARY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HGRO or GARY?

On fees, HGRO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HGRO or GARY?

HGRO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HGRO or GARY?

HGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between HGRO and GARY?

HGRO is categorized as Quality Factor, while GARY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.77% for GARY.