PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGER vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGER vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 29.53% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 36.38% return.


HGER

1D
0.00%
1M
8.95%
6M
20.19%
YTD
29.53%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.44%

XES

1D
3.09%
1M
2.89%
6M
12.93%
YTD
36.38%
1Y
68.96%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
-2.88%
ALL TIME*
-3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$46.51M$66.72M$45.77M
$5.46M$8.52M$12.51M

HGER vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
29.53%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
36.38%5.89%-5.44%6.68%33.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and XES is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.50

The correlation between HGER and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGER vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HGER vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGERXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.23

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

10.31

-0.07

HGER vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the XES Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGER vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGERXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-95.65%

+72.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-21.48%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-45.95%

+31.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-73.66%

+69.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-54.50%

+46.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

6.73%

-2.79%

Volatility

HGER vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) is 5.64%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that HGER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGERXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

9.34%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

21.60%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

30.74%

-13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

38.63%

-20.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

44.85%

-27.18%

HGER vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGER vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than XES's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.47%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.17%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGER and XES have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to HGER (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 18.61% vs 7.20% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 1.17% for XES.

HGER is categorized as Commodities, while XES is Energy Equities. HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.35% for XES.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGER and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer