PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGER vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGER vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 26.84% return.


HGER

1D
-1.14%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
19.14%
6M
17.67%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-0.95%
1M
-12.03%
YTD
26.84%
6M
26.40%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
6.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGER vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
19.14%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
26.84%5.93%8.52%-5.51%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and GSG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.86

The correlation between HGER and GSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGER vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGER vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGERGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.52

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

6.22

+2.33

HGER vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGER vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGERGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-89.62%

+66.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-15.88%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.65%

-15.88%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

-61.70%

+50.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-63.69%

+56.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

4.46%

-1.30%

Volatility

HGER vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) is 3.61%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that HGER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGERGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

5.46%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

20.81%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

23.19%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

22.66%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

22.03%

-4.44%

HGER vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGER vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.95%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGER and GSG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to HGER (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 18.12% vs 14.41% for GSG. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 18.12% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.75% for GSG.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGER and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer