PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFXI vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFXI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HFXI has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.43%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.53% annualized return.


HFXI

1D
0.98%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
14.20%
6M
17.07%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
11.43%

SCHG

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.93%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
18.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFXI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
14.20%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.75%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HFXI and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2015

0.69

The correlation between HFXI and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFXI vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFXI
SCHG

Financial Services

22.8%
6.7%

Industrials

20.1%
5.8%

Technology

14.6%
46.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
1.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.4%

Energy

3.6%
0.8%

Utilities

3.6%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
16.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

HFXI
22.8%
SCHG
6.7%

Industrials

HFXI
20.1%
SCHG
5.8%

Technology

HFXI
14.6%
SCHG
46.3%

Healthcare

HFXI
9.5%
SCHG
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HFXI
7.7%
SCHG
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

HFXI
6.3%
SCHG
1.7%

Basic Materials

HFXI
5.9%
SCHG
1.4%

Energy

HFXI
3.6%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

HFXI
3.6%
SCHG
0.4%

Communication Services

HFXI
3.5%
SCHG
16.0%

Real Estate

HFXI
2.5%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFXI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFXI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFXISCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.27

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

4.25

+7.06

HFXI vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFXI and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFXISCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.33

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.67

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Drawdowns

HFXI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFXISCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-34.59%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-16.41%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-23.39%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-34.59%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-34.59%

+2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-4.25%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.20%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

4.91%

-2.17%

Volatility

HFXI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFXISCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.52%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

12.02%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

15.77%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

22.31%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

21.58%

-4.91%

HFXI vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HFXI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.94%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFXI and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFXI has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.53% vs 11.43% for HFXI. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HFXI.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

HFXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.04% for SCHG.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFXI and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer