PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFXI vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFXI vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly higher than DBAW's 15.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HFXI having a 11.29% annualized return and DBAW not far behind at 11.19%.


HFXI

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.69%
6M
9.89%
YTD
16.19%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.29%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

DBAW

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.63%
6M
10.49%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
11.19%
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.29M$1.79M$1.16M
$10.14M$12.55M$11.09M

HFXI vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
16.19%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
15.22%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HFXI and DBAW is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.88

The correlation between HFXI and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFXI vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFXI
DBAW

Financial Services

24.6%
23.9%

Industrials

18.3%
13.9%

Technology

16.7%
23.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
7.1%

Basic Materials

5.9%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.0%

Energy

3.4%
4.4%

Utilities

3.3%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.3%

Financial Services

HFXI
24.6%
DBAW
23.9%

Industrials

HFXI
18.3%
DBAW
13.9%

Technology

HFXI
16.7%
DBAW
23.5%

Healthcare

HFXI
9.2%
DBAW
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HFXI
7.2%
DBAW
7.1%

Basic Materials

HFXI
5.9%
DBAW
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

HFXI
5.4%
DBAW
5.0%

Energy

HFXI
3.4%
DBAW
4.4%

Utilities

HFXI
3.3%
DBAW
3.0%

Communication Services

HFXI
3.2%
DBAW
4.7%

Real Estate

HFXI
2.2%
DBAW
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFXI vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFXI vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFXIDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.35

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

12.36

-1.58

HFXI vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFXI and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFXI vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, roughly equal to the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFXIDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-31.44%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-9.00%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-14.11%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-17.87%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-31.44%

-0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-3.47%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-4.97%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.44%

+0.51%

Volatility

HFXI vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.83%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFXIDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

4.83%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

12.96%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

14.70%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

14.04%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

15.22%

+1.38%

HFXI vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFXI vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than DBAW's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.70%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.33%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HFXI and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HFXI has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to DBAW (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 11.29% vs 11.19% for DBAW. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.70% for DBAW.

HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFXI and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer