HFXI vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HFXI tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HFXI returned 11.52%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFXI charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

HFXI vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than DBAW's 16.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HFXI having a 11.52% annualized return and DBAW not far behind at 11.49%.

HFXI

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 21.22%
• 1Y: 35.72%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 11.52%

DBAW

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 16.72%
• 6M: 19.43%
• 1Y: 37.58%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFXI vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF	17.66%	30.10%	7.58%	19.56%	-10.71%	13.96%	6.88%	23.67%	-12.69%	22.68%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.72%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HFXI and DBAW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2015	0.87

The correlation between HFXI and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFXI vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HFXI	DBAW
Financial Services	22.8%	24.1%
Industrials	20.1%	15.0%
Technology	14.5%	18.7%
Healthcare	9.5%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	5.3%
Basic Materials	5.9%	6.8%
Energy	3.6%	5.3%
Utilities	3.6%	3.2%
Communication Services	3.5%	5.0%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.5%

Return for Risk

HFXI vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFXI

HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 72
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 85
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFXI vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFXI	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.94	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	4.00	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.57	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	4.20	-0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	17.48	-4.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFXI vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFXI and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFXI	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.94	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.85	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.75	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.63	-0.06

Drawdowns

HFXI vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, roughly equal to the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFXI	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.42%	-31.44%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.84%	-9.00%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	-14.11%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.35%	-17.87%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.42%	-31.44%	-0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-5.00%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.16%	+0.56%

Volatility

HFXI vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.74%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFXI	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	4.74%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.39%	10.99%	+1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	12.86%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	13.74%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	15.28%	+1.35%

HFXI vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFXI vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than DBAW's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.28%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF	3.82%	4.19%	2.68%	2.49%	4.65%	3.10%	2.00%	3.19%	4.33%	2.56%	2.71%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFXI and DBAW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HFXI and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HFXI or DBAW?

HFXI has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to DBAW (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, HFXI or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 11.52% vs 11.49% for DBAW. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFXI or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 11.52% return vs 11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFXI or DBAW?

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFXI or DBAW?

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 3.28% for DBAW.

What is the main difference between HFXI and DBAW?

HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.