HFXI vs. IWFG
HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) and IWFG (NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFXI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while IWFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by New York Life. HFXI is passively managed, while IWFG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFXI returned 20.46%/yr vs 23.02%/yr for IWFG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFXI charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IWFG.
Performance
HFXI vs. IWFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than IWFG's 2.08% return.
HFXI
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 35.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
IWFG
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFXI vs. IWFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 17.13% | 30.10% | 7.58% | 19.56% | 6.33% |
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 2.08% | 14.33% | 37.56% | 38.40% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFXI and IWFG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HFXI and IWFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFXI vs. IWFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFXI
IWFG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
HFXI
IWFG
Industrials
HFXI
IWFG
Technology
HFXI
IWFG
Healthcare
HFXI
IWFG
Consumer Cyclical
HFXI
IWFG
Consumer Defensive
HFXI
IWFG
-
Basic Materials
HFXI
IWFG
-
Energy
HFXI
IWFG
-
Utilities
HFXI
IWFG
Communication Services
HFXI
IWFG
Real Estate
HFXI
IWFG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFXI vs. IWFG — Risk / Return Rank
HFXI
IWFG
HFXI vs. IWFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFXI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.13 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 0.59 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 1.73 | +11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFXI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.72 | +1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.16 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
HFXI vs. IWFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, which is greater than IWFG's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and IWFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFXI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -21.97% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -20.20% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -21.97% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.79% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -4.13% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 6.89% | -4.17% |
Volatility
HFXI vs. IWFG - Volatility Comparison
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) at 3.85%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFXI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 3.85% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 12.59% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 16.50% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 20.48% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 20.48% | -3.85% |
HFXI vs. IWFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFXI vs. IWFG - Dividend Comparison
HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while IWFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 3.84% | 4.19% | 2.68% | 2.49% | 4.65% | 3.10% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.33% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 0.78% |
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.01% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFXI and IWFG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFXI has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to IWFG (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs IWFG's -21.97%.
On 3-year performance, IWFG leads with 23.02% vs 20.46% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IWFG has performed better with a 23.02% return vs 20.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IWFG.
HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for IWFG.
HFXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.46% for IWFG.
HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFXI and IWFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer