PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEZU vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEZU vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than ENOR's 25.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has outperformed ENOR with an annualized return of 11.73%, while ENOR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


HEZU

1D
-1.81%
1M
0.51%
YTD
8.75%
6M
10.10%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
11.73%

ENOR

1D
-2.14%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
25.43%
6M
30.47%
1Y
33.10%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEZU vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
8.75%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
25.43%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HEZU and ENOR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2014

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between HEZU and ENOR has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HEZU vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEZU
ENOR

Financial Services

24.4%
22.4%

Industrials

21.2%
13.9%

Technology

14.5%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
0.2%

Utilities

6.8%
0.7%

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
12.4%

Energy

4.2%
29.2%

Basic Materials

4.1%
10.8%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.4%

Financial Services

HEZU
24.4%
ENOR
22.4%

Industrials

HEZU
21.2%
ENOR
13.9%

Technology

HEZU
14.5%
ENOR
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HEZU
8.4%
ENOR
0.2%

Utilities

HEZU
6.8%
ENOR
0.7%

Healthcare

HEZU
5.8%
ENOR

-

Consumer Defensive

HEZU
5.6%
ENOR
12.4%

Energy

HEZU
4.2%
ENOR
29.2%

Basic Materials

HEZU
4.1%
ENOR
10.8%

Communication Services

HEZU
4.1%
ENOR
5.8%

Real Estate

HEZU
1.0%
ENOR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEZU vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEZU vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEZUENORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.69

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

10.37

-3.77

HEZU vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEZU and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEZUENORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.90

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.35

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.37

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.25

+0.32

Drawdowns

HEZU vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum ENOR drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEZUENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-55.35%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.01%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.83%

-15.84%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

-32.65%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-54.21%

+15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-5.25%

+3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-16.57%

+10.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.20%

-0.37%

Volatility

HEZU vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) have volatilities of 4.86% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEZUENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

4.89%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

13.78%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

17.54%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

22.17%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

24.02%

-5.59%

HEZU vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEZU vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than ENOR's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.36%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.69%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEZU and ENOR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENOR has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to HEZU (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, HEZU leads with 11.73% vs 8.95% for ENOR. On fees, HEZU is cheaper at 0.52% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEZU is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.36% for ENOR.

HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEZU and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer