PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOR vs. NAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENOR vs. NAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly lower than NAT's 57.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ENOR has outperformed NAT with an annualized return of 9.47%, while NAT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.67% annualized return.


ENOR

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
28.94%
6M
35.80%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.47%

NAT

1D
-0.57%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
57.07%
6M
52.53%
1Y
118.64%
3Y*
26.17%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
-2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOR vs. NAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.94%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
57.07%54.57%-33.63%55.83%87.90%-41.48%-32.82%156.48%-13.56%-68.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and NAT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENOR vs. NAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NAT
NAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. NAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENORNATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

3.30

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

3.96

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

6.70

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.74

22.33

-9.59

ENOR vs. NAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the NAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and NAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENORNATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.30

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

-0.05

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.12

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. NAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum NAT drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and NAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENORNATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-90.20%

+34.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-18.45%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

-46.31%

+30.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-59.88%

+27.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.21%

-87.33%

+33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-44.58%

+41.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-44.00%

+27.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

5.53%

-2.36%

Volatility

ENOR vs. NAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is 5.11%, while Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that ENOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENORNATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

9.26%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

27.63%

-14.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

36.21%

-18.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

51.06%

-28.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.02%

58.03%

-34.01%

Dividends

ENOR vs. NAT - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than NAT's 8.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.29%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
8.97%10.47%16.00%11.67%3.59%3.55%15.25%2.03%8.00%21.54%16.31%8.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENOR and NAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAT has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to ENOR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs NAT's -90.20%.

NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENOR and NAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer