ENOR vs. NAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT).

ENOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2012.

Performance

ENOR vs. NAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENOR vs. NAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF	28.39%	32.00%	-2.29%	4.80%	-12.53%	18.69%	2.54%	12.77%	-8.50%	21.98%
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	75.65%	54.57%	-33.63%	55.83%	87.90%	-41.48%	-32.82%	156.48%	-13.56%	-68.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly lower than NAT's 75.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ENOR has outperformed NAT with an annualized return of 10.41%, while NAT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.62% annualized return.

ENOR

• 1D: 2.75%
• 1M: 7.24%
• YTD: 28.39%
• 6M: 30.76%
• 1Y: 46.68%
• 3Y*: 22.37%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

NAT

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: 5.45%
• YTD: 75.65%
• 6M: 99.36%
• 1Y: 169.36%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 21.50%
• 10Y*: -0.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENOR vs. NAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR

ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 92
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NAT

NAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. NAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENOR	NAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	4.69	-2.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	5.12	-2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.61	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	11.63	-8.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	38.34	-25.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENOR vs. NAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the NAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and NAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENOR	NAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	4.69	-2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.42	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	-0.01	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.15	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and NAT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENOR vs. NAT - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than NAT's 8.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF	2.30%	2.96%	6.32%	5.06%	4.02%	2.24%	2.39%	3.15%	2.79%	2.47%	2.96%	3.24%
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	8.02%	10.47%	16.00%	11.67%	3.59%	3.55%	15.25%	2.03%	8.00%	21.54%	16.31%	8.88%

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. NAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum NAT drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and NAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENOR	NAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-90.20%	+34.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.10%	-14.01%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.65%	-61.91%	+29.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.21%	-87.33%	+33.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-38.02%	+38.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.76%	-44.02%	+27.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	4.25%	-0.55%

Volatility

ENOR vs. NAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is 7.60%, while Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a volatility of 14.52%. This indicates that ENOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENOR	NAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.60%	14.52%	-6.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.33%	25.51%	-12.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.04%	36.42%	-13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	51.21%	-28.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.08%	57.92%	-33.84%