ENOR vs. NAT
ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while NAT (Nordic American Tankers Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ENOR returned 9.47%/yr vs -2.67%/yr for NAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENOR vs. NAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly lower than NAT's 57.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ENOR has outperformed NAT with an annualized return of 9.47%, while NAT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.67% annualized return.
ENOR
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 28.94%
- 6M
- 35.80%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
NAT
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 57.07%
- 6M
- 52.53%
- 1Y
- 118.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- -2.67%
ENOR vs. NAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 28.94% | 32.00% | -2.29% | 4.80% | -12.53% | 18.69% | 2.54% | 12.77% | -8.50% | 21.98% |
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 57.07% | 54.57% | -33.63% | 55.83% | 87.90% | -41.48% | -32.82% | 156.48% | -13.56% | -68.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOR and NAT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOR vs. NAT — Risk / Return Rank
ENOR
NAT
ENOR vs. NAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOR | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 3.30 | -1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 3.96 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 6.70 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 22.33 | -9.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOR | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.30 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.35 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | -0.05 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
ENOR vs. NAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum NAT drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and NAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOR | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -90.20% | +34.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -18.45% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -46.31% | +30.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -59.88% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.21% | -87.33% | +33.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -44.58% | +41.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -44.00% | +27.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 5.53% | -2.36% |
Volatility
ENOR vs. NAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is 5.11%, while Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that ENOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOR | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 9.26% | -4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 27.63% | -14.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 36.21% | -18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 51.06% | -28.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 58.03% | -34.01% |
Dividends
ENOR vs. NAT - Dividend Comparison
ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than NAT's 8.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 2.29% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 8.97% | 10.47% | 16.00% | 11.67% | 3.59% | 3.55% | 15.25% | 2.03% | 8.00% | 21.54% | 16.31% | 8.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOR and NAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAT has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to ENOR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs NAT's -90.20%.
NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENOR and NAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer