HEZU vs. KBA
HEZU (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEZU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEZU returned 13.14%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for KBA. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEZU charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.
Performance
HEZU vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 13.14%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.
HEZU
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
KBA
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 45.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
HEZU vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 12.57% | 25.93% | 10.63% | 22.98% | -9.54% | 23.51% | 0.52% | 29.48% | -10.23% | 14.26% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 10.36% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | 35.44% | -26.28% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEZU and KBA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014 | 0.36 |
The correlation between HEZU and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEZU vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEZU
KBA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEZU
KBA
Industrials
HEZU
KBA
Technology
HEZU
KBA
Consumer Cyclical
HEZU
KBA
Utilities
HEZU
KBA
Healthcare
HEZU
KBA
Consumer Defensive
HEZU
KBA
Communication Services
HEZU
KBA
Basic Materials
HEZU
KBA
Energy
HEZU
KBA
Real Estate
HEZU
KBA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEZU vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
HEZU
KBA
HEZU vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEZU | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 5.97 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 15.15 | -5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEZU vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and KBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEZU | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -53.24% | +14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.65% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.83% | -31.23% | +16.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.79% | -39.76% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | -45.32% | +6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -3.67% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -25.71% | +19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.01% | -0.23% |
Volatility
HEZU vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) is 5.46%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that HEZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEZU | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 8.89% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 14.20% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 19.00% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 27.35% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 25.39% | -7.21% |
HEZU vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEZU vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than KBA's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.60% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 23.26% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 5.40% | 3.48% | 1.92% | 3.11% | 2.68% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.42% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEZU and KBA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBA has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to HEZU (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs KBA's -53.24%.
On 10-year performance, HEZU leads with 13.14% vs 10.40% for KBA. On fees, HEZU is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, HEZU has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEZU is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.
HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.42% for KBA.
HEZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while KBA is China Equities. HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.60% for KBA.
KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEZU and KBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer