PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEZU vs. KBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEZU vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 13.14%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.


HEZU

1D
-1.85%
1M
3.67%
YTD
12.57%
6M
12.77%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.14%

KBA

1D
-3.67%
1M
2.74%
YTD
10.36%
6M
10.50%
1Y
45.45%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEZU vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
12.57%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
10.36%33.88%15.73%-16.77%-3.49%3.17%41.62%35.44%-26.28%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HEZU and KBA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014

0.36

The correlation between HEZU and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEZU vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEZU
KBA

Financial Services

23.8%
17.4%

Industrials

21.0%
15.4%

Technology

16.1%
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.4%

Utilities

6.4%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.1%
9.3%

Energy

3.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.5%

Financial Services

HEZU
23.8%
KBA
17.4%

Industrials

HEZU
21.0%
KBA
15.4%

Technology

HEZU
16.1%
KBA
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HEZU
8.4%
KBA
5.4%

Utilities

HEZU
6.4%
KBA
3.2%

Healthcare

HEZU
5.6%
KBA
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

HEZU
5.5%
KBA
6.5%

Communication Services

HEZU
4.3%
KBA
1.4%

Basic Materials

HEZU
4.1%
KBA
9.3%

Energy

HEZU
3.9%
KBA
3.0%

Real Estate

HEZU
0.9%
KBA
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEZU vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

KBA
KBA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEZU vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEZUKBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

5.97

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

15.15

-5.93

HEZU vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEZU and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEZU vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and KBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEZUKBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-53.24%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-7.65%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.83%

-31.23%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

-39.76%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-45.32%

+6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-3.67%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-25.71%

+19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.01%

-0.23%

Volatility

HEZU vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) is 5.46%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that HEZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEZUKBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

8.89%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

14.20%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

19.00%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

27.35%

-10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

25.39%

-7.21%

HEZU vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEZU vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than KBA's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.60%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.42%1.56%2.18%2.34%49.05%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.46%6.62%29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEZU and KBA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBA has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to HEZU (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs KBA's -53.24%.

On 10-year performance, HEZU leads with 13.14% vs 10.40% for KBA. On fees, HEZU is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, HEZU has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEZU is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.42% for KBA.

HEZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while KBA is China Equities. HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.60% for KBA.

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEZU and KBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer