HEZU vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
HEZU and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEZU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Jul 9, 2014. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both HEZU and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HEZU or KBA.
Key characteristics
| HEZU | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.44% | 21.39% |
| 1Y Return | 19.26% | 17.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.33% | -8.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.08% | 2.84% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.06% | 3.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.60 | 0.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.21 | 1.23 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.01 | 0.39 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.37 | 2.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.63% | 7.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.11% | 27.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.80% | -53.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.75% | -33.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEZU and KBA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HEZU vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 21.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 9.06%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEZU vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HEZU vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HEZU vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than KBA's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.81% | 2.52% | 23.26% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 5.40% | 3.48% | 1.92% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 1.15% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.93% | 2.34% | 26.65% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 0.99% | 4.90% | 29.08% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
HEZU vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HEZU vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) is 3.64%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that HEZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.