HEZU vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
HEZU and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEZU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Jul 9, 2014. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
HEZU vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEZU vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 1.17% | 25.93% | 10.63% | 22.98% | -9.54% | 23.51% | 0.52% | 29.48% | -10.23% | 5.97% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 23.30% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 2.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 23.30% return.
HEZU
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
BCI
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEZU vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HEZU vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
HEZU
BCI
HEZU vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEZU | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.80 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.39 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.29 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 9.08 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEZU | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.80 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.79 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.47 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEZU and BCI is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HEZU vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than BCI's 13.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.89% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 23.26% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 5.40% | 3.48% | 1.92% | 3.11% | 2.68% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.37% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HEZU vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and BCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEZU | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -32.69% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -9.28% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.79% | -26.50% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -0.86% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -12.19% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.37% | -0.23% |
Volatility
HEZU vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) is 6.56%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that HEZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEZU | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 7.18% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 13.62% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 17.10% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 16.63% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 15.57% | +2.80% |