ENOR vs. EIRL
ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) and EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - ENOR tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index while EIRL tracks the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENOR returned 9.52%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for EIRL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENOR charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EIRL.
Performance
ENOR vs. EIRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 18.99% return, which is significantly higher than EIRL's 7.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENOR having a 9.52% annualized return and EIRL not far ahead at 9.70%.
ENOR
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -9.16%
- YTD
- 18.99%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- 22.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
EIRL
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
ENOR vs. EIRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 18.99% | 32.00% | -2.29% | 4.80% | -12.53% | 18.69% | 2.54% | 12.77% | -8.50% | 21.98% |
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 7.44% | 28.82% | -1.64% | 35.13% | -18.83% | 13.72% | 9.63% | 28.15% | -21.92% | 29.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOR and EIRL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENOR and EIRL has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ENOR vs. EIRL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENOR
EIRL
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Energy
ENOR
EIRL
Financial Services
ENOR
EIRL
Industrials
ENOR
EIRL
Consumer Defensive
ENOR
EIRL
Basic Materials
ENOR
EIRL
Communication Services
ENOR
EIRL
-
Technology
ENOR
EIRL
Utilities
ENOR
EIRL
-
Consumer Cyclical
ENOR
EIRL
Real Estate
ENOR
EIRL
Healthcare
ENOR
-
EIRL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOR vs. EIRL — Risk / Return Rank
ENOR
EIRL
ENOR vs. EIRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENOR | EIRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.55 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 5.10 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENOR vs. EIRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than EIRL's maximum drawdown of -46.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and EIRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOR | EIRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -46.48% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -14.28% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -23.04% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -40.14% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.21% | -46.48% | -7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | 0.00% | -10.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -9.08% | -7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 4.33% | -1.00% |
Volatility
ENOR vs. EIRL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) at 3.52%. This indicates that ENOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOR | EIRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.52% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 14.96% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 18.04% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 21.17% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 21.69% | +2.27% |
ENOR vs. EIRL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than EIRL's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENOR vs. EIRL - Dividend Comparison
ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than EIRL's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 2.42% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.82% | 0.50% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.44% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 5.61% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOR and EIRL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENOR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to EIRL (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs EIRL's -46.48%.
On 10-year performance, EIRL leads with 9.70% vs 9.52% for ENOR. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.
ENOR has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.42% for EIRL.
ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.49% for EIRL.
ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENOR and EIRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer