ENOR vs. EDEN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - ENOR tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index while EDEN tracks the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENOR returned 9.38%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for EDEN. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.53% expense ratio.

Performance

ENOR vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 17.50% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENOR having a 9.38% annualized return and EDEN not far behind at 9.32%.

ENOR

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -10.30%
• YTD: 17.50%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 21.63%
• 3Y*: 20.52%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 9.38%

EDEN

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -3.46%
• 6M: -3.93%
• 1Y: -0.63%
• 3Y*: 3.19%
• 5Y*: 2.15%
• 10Y*: 9.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOR vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF	17.50%	32.00%	-2.29%	4.80%	-12.53%	18.69%	2.54%	12.77%	-8.50%	21.98%
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	-3.46%	10.58%	-3.94%	17.99%	-11.47%	14.81%	42.56%	24.37%	-14.43%	35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and EDEN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012	0.55

The correlation between ENOR and EDEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENOR vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ENOR	EDEN
Energy	28.0%	1.0%
Financial Services	22.0%	15.8%
Industrials	14.4%	29.4%
Consumer Defensive	12.0%	4.7%
Basic Materials	11.0%	4.7%
Communication Services	6.6%	-
Technology	4.4%	0.9%
Utilities	0.7%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Healthcare	-	36.0%

Return for Risk

ENOR vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR

ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 38
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EDEN

EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 8
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENOR	EDEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	-0.03	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	0.10	+1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.01	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	-0.03	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	-0.06	+6.46

ENOR vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and EDEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENOR	EDEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-36.61%	-18.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.24%	-21.17%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.84%	-29.31%	+13.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.65%	-36.61%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.21%	-36.61%	-17.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.24%	-13.92%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-7.38%	-9.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	9.81%	-6.41%

Volatility

ENOR vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is 4.36%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that ENOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENOR	EDEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	4.76%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	15.73%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.79%	20.72%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.16%	20.27%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	19.23%	+4.55%

ENOR vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENOR and EDEN have an expense ratio of 0.53%.

Dividends

ENOR vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than EDEN's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	3.17%	2.79%	1.50%	1.92%	1.47%	0.74%	0.42%	2.36%	2.01%	2.03%	1.28%	1.46%
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF	5.68%	2.96%	6.32%	5.06%	4.02%	2.24%	2.39%	3.15%	2.79%	2.47%	2.96%	3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENOR and EDEN in my portfolio?

ENOR and EDEN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENOR or EDEN?

EDEN has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to ENOR (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

Which ETF is better, ENOR or EDEN?

On 10-year performance, ENOR leads with 9.38% vs 9.32% for EDEN. Both ETFs have the same 0.53% expense ratio. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ENOR or EDEN?

Over the 10-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENOR or EDEN?

ENOR and EDEN have the same expense ratio: 0.53% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENOR or EDEN?

ENOR has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 3.17% for EDEN.

What is the main difference between ENOR and EDEN?

ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.