PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOR vs. QAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ENOR vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ENOR vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.39%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
-1.16%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ENOR has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 10.41%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.21% annualized return.


ENOR

1D
2.75%
1M
7.24%
YTD
28.39%
6M
30.76%
1Y
46.68%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
10.41%

QAT

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-3.61%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ENOR vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ENOR vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENORQATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

0.62

+1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

0.86

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.13

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.82

+2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.84

1.80

+11.04

ENOR vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and QAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENORQATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.62

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.24

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.18

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.07

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and QAT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ENOR vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than QAT's 3.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.30%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
3.55%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than QAT's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and QAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ENORQATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-45.21%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-10.60%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-33.17%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.21%

-34.04%

-20.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.45%

+13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-19.29%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

4.81%

-1.11%

Volatility

ENOR vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.05%. This indicates that ENOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ENORQATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

5.05%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

9.07%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

13.22%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

14.84%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

17.60%

+6.48%