HERO vs. QUS
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.62%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
HERO vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
HERO vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and QUS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.57 |
The correlation between HERO and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
QUS
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
QUS
Technology
HERO
QUS
Industrials
HERO
QUS
Basic Materials
HERO
-
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
QUS
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
QUS
Energy
HERO
-
QUS
Financial Services
HERO
-
QUS
Healthcare
HERO
-
QUS
Real Estate
HERO
-
QUS
Utilities
HERO
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
QUS
HERO vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | 1.95 | -2.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 2.81 | -3.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.35 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.59 | -3.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 11.54 | -12.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.95 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.78 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.77 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -33.78% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | -6.85% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -13.94% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -22.30% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -0.50% | -26.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -3.70% | -22.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 1.53% | +12.58% |
Volatility
HERO vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 1.78% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 6.66% | +8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 9.09% | +10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 14.33% | +9.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 16.42% | +8.08% |
HERO vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and QUS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.31% for QUS.
HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer