PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERO vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERO vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 7.09% return.


HERO

1D
1.40%
1M
4.91%
6M
-9.80%
YTD
-10.56%
1Y
-13.47%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
-1.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.68%

OUSA

1D
0.53%
1M
2.40%
6M
3.84%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
10.40%
ALL TIME*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$881.17K$612.17K$690.19K
$872.37K$1.31M$1.44M

HERO vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
-10.56%28.74%17.65%8.36%-33.42%-8.37%91.02%9.12%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
7.09%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and OUSA is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.49

The correlation between HERO and OUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HERO vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERO
OUSA

Communication Services

92.0%
10.3%

Technology

6.7%
23.7%

Industrials

1.4%
11.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.4%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

18.6%

Healthcare

-

15.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

HERO
92.0%
OUSA
10.3%

Technology

HERO
6.7%
OUSA
23.7%

Industrials

HERO
1.4%
OUSA
11.9%

Basic Materials

HERO

-

OUSA

-

Consumer Cyclical

HERO

-

OUSA
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

HERO

-

OUSA
7.4%

Energy

HERO

-

OUSA

-

Financial Services

HERO

-

OUSA
18.6%

Healthcare

HERO

-

OUSA
15.1%

Real Estate

HERO

-

OUSA

-

Utilities

HERO

-

OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERO vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HERO
HERO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERO vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEROOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.28

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

1.95

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

6.80

-7.56

HERO vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERO vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEROOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.02%

-33.12%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.78%

-8.36%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-13.14%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.42%

-19.54%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.74%

-0.23%

-24.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

-3.50%

-22.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.64%

2.39%

+15.25%

Volatility

HERO vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEROOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

3.65%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

8.12%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

10.25%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

13.38%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

15.19%

+9.26%

HERO vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERO vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than OUSA's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
1.74%1.62%1.06%0.73%0.28%0.79%0.71%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.35%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERO and OUSA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.96% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.96% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.

HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.35% for OUSA.

HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERO and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer