HERO vs. MFUS
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.62%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
HERO vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and MFUS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between HERO and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
HERO vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
MFUS
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
MFUS
Technology
HERO
MFUS
Industrials
HERO
MFUS
Basic Materials
HERO
-
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
MFUS
Energy
HERO
-
MFUS
Financial Services
HERO
-
MFUS
Healthcare
HERO
-
MFUS
Real Estate
HERO
-
MFUS
Utilities
HERO
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
MFUS
HERO vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | 2.63 | -3.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 3.77 | -4.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.47 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 4.41 | -4.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 18.13 | -19.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 2.63 | -3.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.86 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.79 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -35.21% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | -6.39% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -15.39% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -18.22% | -30.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | 0.00% | -27.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -4.00% | -21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 1.55% | +12.56% |
Volatility
HERO vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 3.19% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 8.22% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 10.72% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 15.03% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 17.35% | +7.15% |
HERO vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and MFUS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.36% for MFUS.
HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer