HERO vs. IXP
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index while IXP tracks the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for IXP. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IXP.
Performance
HERO vs. IXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than IXP's -1.64% return.
HERO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
IXP
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $881.17K | $612.17K | $690.19K | |
| $6.29M | $4.27M | $3.74M |
HERO vs. IXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -10.56% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -1.64% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 22.16% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and IXP is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between HERO and IXP shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. IXP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
IXP
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
IXP
Technology
HERO
IXP
Industrials
HERO
IXP
-
Basic Materials
HERO
-
IXP
-
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
IXP
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
IXP
-
Energy
HERO
-
IXP
-
Financial Services
HERO
-
IXP
-
Healthcare
HERO
-
IXP
-
Real Estate
HERO
-
IXP
Utilities
HERO
-
IXP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. IXP — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
IXP
HERO vs. IXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 0.74 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 1.92 | -2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. IXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than IXP's maximum drawdown of -50.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and IXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -50.11% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -12.26% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -17.54% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -44.30% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.74% | -5.75% | -18.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -11.89% | -14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 4.70% | +12.94% |
Volatility
HERO vs. IXP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) at 6.73%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 6.73% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 12.41% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 16.10% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 19.26% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 18.59% | +5.86% |
HERO vs. IXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IXP's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. IXP - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than IXP's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.32% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and IXP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to IXP (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs IXP's -50.11%.
On 5-year performance, IXP leads with 8.32% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, IXP is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IXP has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXP has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXP is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.74% for HERO.
HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.43% for IXP.
IXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and IXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer