HERO vs. ISCMF
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HERO returned 7.77%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
HERO vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -19.06% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -19.06%
- 6M
- -18.64%
- 1Y
- -22.57%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HERO vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -19.06% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -23.90% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and ISCMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | -0.00 |
The correlation between HERO and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
ISCMF
HERO vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 2.31 | -1.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 5.53 | -6.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 11.85 | -13.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -25.42% | -28.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.33% | -5.69% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.33% | -7.62% | -21.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.89% | -5.26% | -26.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -13.35% | -12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.43% | 2.65% | +12.78% |
Volatility
HERO vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 4.32%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 5.11% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 15.45% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 17.84% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 14.29% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 14.29% | +10.14% |
HERO vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 2.00% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to HERO (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 7.77% for HERO. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer