HERO vs. FTCS
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for FTCS. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
HERO vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTCS's 7.68% return.
HERO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
FTCS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.78M | $52.86M | $63.57M | |
| $881.17K | $612.17K | $690.19K |
HERO vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -10.56% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 7.68% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 13.05% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and FTCS is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HERO and FTCS has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HERO vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
FTCS
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
FTCS
Technology
HERO
FTCS
Industrials
HERO
FTCS
Basic Materials
HERO
-
FTCS
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
FTCS
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
FTCS
Energy
HERO
-
FTCS
Financial Services
HERO
-
FTCS
Healthcare
HERO
-
FTCS
Real Estate
HERO
-
FTCS
-
Utilities
HERO
-
FTCS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
FTCS
HERO vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 1.38 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 3.06 | -3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -53.64% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -7.74% | -23.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -12.62% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -20.93% | -25.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.74% | -1.41% | -23.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -6.89% | -19.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 3.48% | +14.16% |
Volatility
HERO vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 4.07%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 4.07% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 8.15% | +7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 10.55% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 13.25% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 15.56% | +8.89% |
HERO vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than FTCS's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.07% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and FTCS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to FTCS (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs FTCS's -53.64%.
On 5-year performance, FTCS leads with 6.22% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTCS has performed better with a 6.22% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.07% for FTCS.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.53% for FTCS.
FTCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer