HERO vs. FTCS
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -4.90%/yr vs 5.75%/yr for FTCS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
HERO vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -20.07% return, which is significantly lower than FTCS's 1.80% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -20.07%
- 6M
- -19.79%
- 1Y
- -25.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
HERO vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -20.07% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.80% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 13.05% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and FTCS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HERO and FTCS has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HERO vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
FTCS
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
FTCS
Technology
HERO
FTCS
Industrials
HERO
FTCS
Basic Materials
HERO
-
FTCS
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
FTCS
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
FTCS
Energy
HERO
-
FTCS
Financial Services
HERO
-
FTCS
Healthcare
HERO
-
FTCS
Real Estate
HERO
-
FTCS
-
Utilities
HERO
-
FTCS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
FTCS
HERO vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.09 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 0.64 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 1.46 | -3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -53.64% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.21% | -7.74% | -22.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.21% | -12.62% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.06% | -20.93% | -27.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.74% | -5.28% | -27.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -6.92% | -19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.55% | 3.38% | +12.17% |
Volatility
HERO vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 3.01%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.01% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 7.27% | +7.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 9.91% | +9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 13.14% | +10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 15.53% | +8.90% |
HERO vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than FTCS's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 2.03% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and FTCS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FTCS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs FTCS's -53.64%.
On 5-year performance, FTCS leads with 5.75% vs -4.90% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTCS has performed better with a 5.75% return vs -4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.10% for FTCS.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.53% for FTCS.
FTCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer