HERO vs. BOTZ
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.37%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
HERO vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -15.16% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's -0.92% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- -17.60%
- YTD
- -15.16%
- 1Y
- -18.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- -3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -15.16% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -0.92% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and BOTZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HERO and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
BOTZ
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
BOTZ
Technology
HERO
BOTZ
Industrials
HERO
BOTZ
Basic Materials
HERO
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
BOTZ
Energy
HERO
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
HERO
-
BOTZ
Healthcare
HERO
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
HERO
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
HERO
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
BOTZ
HERO vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.10 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.61 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 1.77 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -55.54% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -19.34% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -29.02% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.57% | -55.54% | +8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.61% | -13.77% | -14.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.01% | -18.23% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.63% | 6.60% | +10.03% |
Volatility
HERO vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 5.27%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 9.94% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.71% | 21.13% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 26.23% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 27.20% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 25.88% | -1.48% |
HERO vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than BOTZ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.84% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to HERO (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.50% vs -3.37% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.50% return vs -3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.49% for BOTZ.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer