HEFA vs. DBJP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP).
HEFA and DBJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2014. DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. Both HEFA and DBJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HEFA or DBJP.
Performance
HEFA vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 8.59%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.
HEFA
12.34%
-2.05%
-1.28%
16.99%
9.81%
8.59%
DBJP
21.23%
-0.01%
0.62%
19.92%
14.90%
10.20%
Key characteristics
| HEFA | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.54 | 1.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.06 | 1.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.72 | 0.98 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.07 | 3.33 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.09% | 6.33% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.92% | 20.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.39% | -31.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.96% | -7.92% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEFA vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.46% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and DBJP is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HEFA vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HEFA vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than DBJP's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 2.87% | 3.01% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 5.37% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% | 3.39% | 0.00% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 3.11% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% | 10.53% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and DBJP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HEFA vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is 2.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that HEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.