DBJP vs. FJSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX).
DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. FJSCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.
Performance
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 6.72% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
FJSCX Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund | 2.44% | 26.43% | 8.03% | 15.15% | -14.49% | -0.36% | 4.80% | 22.00% | -15.98% | 34.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than FJSCX's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has outperformed FJSCX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while FJSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.96% annualized return.
DBJP
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 18.90%
- 1Y
- 40.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
FJSCX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -12.79%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FJSCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. FJSCX — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
FJSCX
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | FJSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.32 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 1.81 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.80 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 6.91 | +5.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | FJSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.32 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.39 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.51 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.29 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and FJSCX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than FJSCX's 17.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.64% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
FJSCX Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund | 17.20% | 17.62% | 4.54% | 2.82% | 0.05% | 12.01% | 1.59% | 7.13% | 5.55% | 3.91% | 2.83% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum FJSCX drawdown of -71.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and FJSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | FJSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -71.42% | +40.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -12.79% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -29.74% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -32.10% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -12.79% | +5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -26.78% | +19.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.34% | -0.13% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. FJSCX - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX) have volatilities of 8.10% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | FJSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 8.06% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 13.93% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.52% | 18.78% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.97% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.81% | +3.96% |