HECA vs. NTSI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) and NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HECA charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NTSI.

Performance

HECA vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HECA achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than NTSI's 7.91% return.

HECA

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 20.67%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HECA vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF	0.54%	12.83%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	7.91%	9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HECA and NTSI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

HECA vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 38
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HECA vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HECA	NTSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.39	+0.79

Drawdowns

HECA vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HECA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECA and NTSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HECA	NTSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-34.01%	+22.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.33%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.80%	-1.70%	-8.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-9.18%	+6.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HECA	NTSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	14.95%	-2.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.41%	15.68%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	15.63%	-3.22%

HECA vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HECA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

HECA vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison

HECA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than NTSI's 3.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF	2.01%	2.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.48%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HECA and NTSI in my portfolio?

HECA and NTSI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HECA or NTSI?

On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HECA or NTSI?

NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for HECA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HECA or NTSI?

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 2.01% for HECA.

What is the main difference between HECA and NTSI?

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for HECA and 0.26% for NTSI.