HECA vs. HFGM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) and HFGM (Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HECA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while HFGM is a Macro Trading fund actively managed by Unlimited. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECA charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for HFGM.

Performance

HECA vs. HFGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HECA achieves a -2.17% return, which is significantly lower than HFGM's 9.44% return.

HECA

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: -2.17%
• 6M: -2.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HFGM

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -6.40%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 7.33%
• 1Y: 33.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HECA vs. HFGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF	-2.17%	12.83%
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	9.44%	18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HECA and HFGM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

HECA vs. HFGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HECA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HFGM

HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 47
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 41
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HECA vs. HFGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HECA	HFGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.55	—

Drawdowns

HECA vs. HFGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HECA drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, which is greater than HFGM's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECA and HFGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HECA	HFGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-10.97%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.23%	-9.82%	-2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-2.93%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HECA	HFGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	22.89%	-10.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.61%	21.65%	-9.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.61%	21.65%	-9.04%

HECA vs. HFGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HECA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HFGM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HECA vs. HFGM - Dividend Comparison

HECA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than HFGM's 10.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF	2.06%	2.02%
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	10.26%	11.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HECA and HFGM in my portfolio?

HECA and HFGM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HECA or HFGM?

On fees, HFGM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HECA or HFGM?

HFGM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for HECA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HECA or HFGM?

HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 2.06% for HECA.

What is the main difference between HECA and HFGM?

HECA is categorized as Global Allocation, while HFGM is Macro Trading. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Unlimited. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for HECA and 0.95% for HFGM.