PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HDV having a 15.30% return and XLB slightly higher at 15.57%. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 9.47%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


HDV

1D
0.87%
1M
2.05%
YTD
15.30%
6M
15.20%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
9.47%

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.99%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
15.30%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and XLB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and XLB has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDV vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
XLB

Consumer Defensive

24.2%

-

Energy

21.0%

-

Healthcare

17.0%

-

Financial Services

10.8%

-

Technology

9.7%

-

Utilities

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
12.7%

Industrials

1.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
87.3%

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.2%
XLB

-

Energy

HDV
21.0%
XLB

-

Healthcare

HDV
17.0%
XLB

-

Financial Services

HDV
10.8%
XLB

-

Technology

HDV
9.7%
XLB

-

Utilities

HDV
8.9%
XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
6.0%
XLB
12.7%

Industrials

HDV
1.3%
XLB
1.5%

Basic Materials

HDV
1.1%
XLB
87.3%

Communication Services

HDV
0.1%
XLB

-

Real Estate

HDV

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDVXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

1.65

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

5.05

+6.54

HDV vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDV vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-59.83%

+22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-12.38%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-23.17%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-24.72%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-37.27%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.25%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-10.83%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

4.04%

-2.17%

Volatility

HDV vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.10%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

7.05%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

13.58%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

17.49%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

19.06%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

20.70%

-4.97%

HDV vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDV vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than XLB's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.84%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and XLB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.54% vs 9.47% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLB.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.68% for XLB.

HDV is categorized as Dividend, while XLB is Materials. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.13% for XLB.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer