PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 9.36%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.72% annualized return.


HDV

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.04%
YTD
14.11%
6M
13.57%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.36%

VGT

1D
3.42%
1M
6.55%
YTD
28.27%
6M
29.82%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
30.76%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
25.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.11%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.27%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and VGT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.50

The correlation between HDV and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDV vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
VGT

Consumer Defensive

24.2%

-

Energy

21.0%
0.3%

Healthcare

17.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

10.8%
0.5%

Technology

9.7%
98.5%

Utilities

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
0.1%

Industrials

1.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.2%
VGT

-

Energy

HDV
21.0%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

HDV
17.0%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

HDV
10.8%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

HDV
9.7%
VGT
98.5%

Utilities

HDV
8.9%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
6.0%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

HDV
1.3%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

HDV
1.1%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

HDV
0.1%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

HDV

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDVVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.41

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

10.55

+0.53

HDV vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDV vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-54.63%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-16.40%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-27.23%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-35.07%

+19.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-35.07%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-4.01%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-7.95%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

5.29%

-3.42%

Volatility

HDV vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.28%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

10.42%

-7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

18.28%

-10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

22.20%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

25.45%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

24.75%

-9.01%

HDV vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDV vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.56%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and VGT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to HDV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.72% vs 9.36% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.

HDV is categorized as Dividend, while VGT is Technology Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer