PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. SDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 9.47%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


HDV

1D
0.87%
1M
2.05%
YTD
15.30%
6M
15.20%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
9.47%

SDOG

1D
1.26%
1M
5.43%
YTD
17.13%
6M
16.28%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
15.30%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
17.13%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and SDOG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.86

The correlation between HDV and SDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDV vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
SDOG

Consumer Defensive

24.2%
9.5%

Energy

21.0%
9.1%

Healthcare

17.0%
9.8%

Financial Services

10.8%
10.6%

Technology

9.7%
16.2%

Utilities

8.9%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
16.3%

Industrials

1.3%
7.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
8.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.2%
SDOG
9.5%

Energy

HDV
21.0%
SDOG
9.1%

Healthcare

HDV
17.0%
SDOG
9.8%

Financial Services

HDV
10.8%
SDOG
10.6%

Technology

HDV
9.7%
SDOG
16.2%

Utilities

HDV
8.9%
SDOG
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
6.0%
SDOG
16.3%

Industrials

HDV
1.3%
SDOG
7.5%

Basic Materials

HDV
1.1%
SDOG
3.5%

Communication Services

HDV
0.1%
SDOG
8.4%

Real Estate

HDV

-

SDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDVSDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

4.25

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

13.63

-2.04

HDV vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDV vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and SDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-43.56%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-6.24%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-16.00%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-19.84%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-43.56%

+6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-4.91%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.94%

-0.07%

Volatility

HDV vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.10%, while ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.34%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

8.02%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

11.52%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

15.44%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

19.06%

-3.33%

HDV vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDV vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than SDOG's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.84%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.26%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and SDOG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 9.47% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.84% for HDV.

HDV is categorized as Dividend, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and SDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer